WebQuest

The 1960s: A Decade of Change

Evaluation

You will be graded on the following things:

� Effort�did you take the time to do a good job; is it well-rehearsed?
� Coverage�did you hit the key points for your topic (10 of the most important events)?
� Audio�Is what you are saying in your video CLEAR, APPROPRIATE, and ACCURATE?
� Creativity�Did you take the time to create interesting representations of the events using props and extras as needed? Does the video flow smoothly�is it in chronological order?
� Depth�do your explanations show depth of understanding about the events that you have chosen?
� Time�minimum 10 minutes, maximum 15 minutes
� Misc.�Is the video edited well; does is flow; is everyone included equally on the video?
� Debate�Did you know your events well enough to make clear, intelligent, and persuasive arguments as to why they are the most important from the decade?
� AGAIN, REMEMBER EVERYTHING MUST BE SCHOOL APPROPRIATE: NO CUSSING, SEXUAL GESTURES, OR INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR ON BEHALF OF YOU OR YOUR GROUP OR YOU WILL RECEIVE A ZERO (0)�this means you might want to check with me if you are unsure!!!

Please see below for the point values of each of the different parts of the project:

1.) Individual PowerPoint - 45 points
2.) Group Video - 90 points
3.) Debate Forum - 25 points
4.) Peer / Self Evaluation - 15 points
___________
Total = 175 points

Rubric

#	Excellant	Good	Satisfactory	Poor	Score
Individual PowerPoint	PowerPoint is well put together / organized Includes 10 events It is obvious that thought went into choosing the events-good explanations as to their importance PowerPoint is clear & easy to read Used good/reliable information Good use of pictures *Has a wide array of events for topic	PowerPoint is well put together / organized Includes 10 events Some good thought went into choosing the events-pretty good explanations as to their importance PowerPoint is clear & easy to read Used good/reliable information Has some good pictures *Has some variety of events for topic	PowerPoint may not be well put together or well-organized Includes 10 events, but not all of them might be well-chosen or thought out It is clear that not much thought went into choosing the events Explanations as to their importance are unclear and unpersuasive PowerPoint may not be clear & easy to read May not have used good/reliable information Contains some pictures Has little, if any, variety of events for topic	PowerPoint is not well put together or organized Does not include 10 events Little thought went into choosing the events-little or no explanation as to their importance PowerPoint is clear & easy to read Uses poor, unreliable or inaccurate information Uses few, if any, pictures *Has little or no variety of events for topic	45 points
Group Video	Video is well put together & organized in chronological order Includes a variety of events from all topics which are represented equally throughout the video The audio is clear and understandable Looks professional Excellant use of props, costumes, and extras as needed It is obvious that the group put in a great deal of effort	Video is well put together & organized in chronological order Includes a decent variety of events from all topics which are represented equally throughout the video The audio is mostly clear and understandable Looks professional Good use of props, costumes, and extras as needed It is clear that the group put in a good amount of effort	Video may be adequately put together but may not be organized in chronological order Includes little variety of events from the different topics which may not be represented equally throughout the video The audio is not always clear and understandable May not look professional Little or no use of props, costumes, and extras as needed It is clear that the group did not put in an adequate amount of effort into the video	Video is poorly put together and not organized in chronological order Includes little or no variety of events from the different topics which may not be represented equally throughout the video The audio is not always clear and understandable, making the video hard to watch Does not look professional Little or no use of props, costumes, and extras as needed It is clear that the group put in very little effort into the creation of this video	90 points
Debate Forum	It is clear that student understands his/her topic and all the major events that happened within that topic. Viewpoints are clear and organized. Arguments are supported by facts and examples. Rebuttle arguments are clear and persuasive and student gives an excellant defense of his/her claims. Excellant projection of voice. It is obvious that the student is well prepared.	The student understands his/her topic and all the major events that happened within that topic fairly well. Viewpoints are mostly clear and organized. Most all arguments are supported by facts and examples. Most rebuttle arguments are clear and persuasive and student gives a good defense of his/her claims. Good projection of voice. Student seems to be fairly well prepared.	The student understands his/her topic and all the major events that happened within that topic at certain points but not overall. Viewpoints are not always clear and organized. Not all arguments are supported by facts and examples. Few rebuttle arguments; little or no defense of his/her claims. *Little projection of voice making student seem unprepared.	The student is unclear and disorganized throughout debate; does not seem to understand topic well, if at all. Few or no real arguments are given; student seems disorganized. Few, if any, arguments are supported by facts and examples. Few, if any, rebuttle arguments; little or no defense of his/her claims. Poort projection of voice Student seems very unprepared.	25 points
Peer / Self Evaluation	Participated in group discussions Always in attendance at school and at out of school meetings Helped to keep group focused and on task Contributed useful ideas and information High quality of work given Was a valuable asset to the team	Participated in group discussions Most always in attendance at school and at out of school meetings Helped to keep group focused and on task most of the time Contributed good ideas and information Good quality of work given Was a helpful asset to the team	At times participated in group discussions Not always in attendance at school and at out of school meetings Did little to help keep group focused and on task Contributed few ideas Quality of work given was mostly satisfactory Wasn't always an asset to the team	Rarely participated in group discussions Absent often and rarely attended out of school meetings Often off task and unfocused Contributed few, if any, helpful ideas Poor quality of work Wasn't a team player and did not contribute to group	15 points
Total Score: 175 points

The Public URL for this WebQuest:
http://zunal.com/webquest.php?w=92550
WebQuest Hits: 5,930
Save WebQuest as PDF

#	Excellant	Good	Satisfactory	Poor	Score
Individual PowerPoint	PowerPoint is well put together / organized Includes 10 events It is obvious that thought went into choosing the events-good explanations as to their importance PowerPoint is clear & easy to read Used good/reliable information Good use of pictures *Has a wide array of events for topic	PowerPoint is well put together / organized Includes 10 events Some good thought went into choosing the events-pretty good explanations as to their importance PowerPoint is clear & easy to read Used good/reliable information Has some good pictures *Has some variety of events for topic	PowerPoint may not be well put together or well-organized Includes 10 events, but not all of them might be well-chosen or thought out It is clear that not much thought went into choosing the events Explanations as to their importance are unclear and unpersuasive PowerPoint may not be clear & easy to read May not have used good/reliable information Contains some pictures Has little, if any, variety of events for topic	PowerPoint is not well put together or organized Does not include 10 events Little thought went into choosing the events-little or no explanation as to their importance PowerPoint is clear & easy to read Uses poor, unreliable or inaccurate information Uses few, if any, pictures *Has little or no variety of events for topic	45 points
Group Video	Video is well put together & organized in chronological order Includes a variety of events from all topics which are represented equally throughout the video The audio is clear and understandable Looks professional Excellant use of props, costumes, and extras as needed It is obvious that the group put in a great deal of effort	Video is well put together & organized in chronological order Includes a decent variety of events from all topics which are represented equally throughout the video The audio is mostly clear and understandable Looks professional Good use of props, costumes, and extras as needed It is clear that the group put in a good amount of effort	Video may be adequately put together but may not be organized in chronological order Includes little variety of events from the different topics which may not be represented equally throughout the video The audio is not always clear and understandable May not look professional Little or no use of props, costumes, and extras as needed It is clear that the group did not put in an adequate amount of effort into the video	Video is poorly put together and not organized in chronological order Includes little or no variety of events from the different topics which may not be represented equally throughout the video The audio is not always clear and understandable, making the video hard to watch Does not look professional Little or no use of props, costumes, and extras as needed It is clear that the group put in very little effort into the creation of this video	90 points
Debate Forum	It is clear that student understands his/her topic and all the major events that happened within that topic. Viewpoints are clear and organized. Arguments are supported by facts and examples. Rebuttle arguments are clear and persuasive and student gives an excellant defense of his/her claims. Excellant projection of voice. It is obvious that the student is well prepared.	The student understands his/her topic and all the major events that happened within that topic fairly well. Viewpoints are mostly clear and organized. Most all arguments are supported by facts and examples. Most rebuttle arguments are clear and persuasive and student gives a good defense of his/her claims. Good projection of voice. Student seems to be fairly well prepared.	The student understands his/her topic and all the major events that happened within that topic at certain points but not overall. Viewpoints are not always clear and organized. Not all arguments are supported by facts and examples. Few rebuttle arguments; little or no defense of his/her claims. *Little projection of voice making student seem unprepared.	The student is unclear and disorganized throughout debate; does not seem to understand topic well, if at all. Few or no real arguments are given; student seems disorganized. Few, if any, arguments are supported by facts and examples. Few, if any, rebuttle arguments; little or no defense of his/her claims. Poort projection of voice Student seems very unprepared.	25 points
Peer / Self Evaluation	Participated in group discussions Always in attendance at school and at out of school meetings Helped to keep group focused and on task Contributed useful ideas and information High quality of work given Was a valuable asset to the team	Participated in group discussions Most always in attendance at school and at out of school meetings Helped to keep group focused and on task most of the time Contributed good ideas and information Good quality of work given Was a helpful asset to the team	At times participated in group discussions Not always in attendance at school and at out of school meetings Did little to help keep group focused and on task Contributed few ideas Quality of work given was mostly satisfactory Wasn't always an asset to the team	Rarely participated in group discussions Absent often and rarely attended out of school meetings Often off task and unfocused Contributed few, if any, helpful ideas Poor quality of work Wasn't a team player and did not contribute to group	15 points
Total Score: 175 points

WebQuest

The 1960s: A Decade of Change

Evaluation

Rubric

Ready to go?