WebQuest
A KESTREL FOR A KNAVE
Evaluation
Your logs and movie will be evaluated by your teacher following the rubric below. Each student will get an individual mark.
In addition, each movie fragment will be assessed by the other groups, each group focusing on the fourth aspect of the rubric: creativity and ease of handling of multi media.
The final score will be the average between teacher assessment (logs and movie, complete rubric) and peer assessment (movie, fourth aspect of the rubric).
Rubric
| # | Poor | Not sufficient | Sufficient to good | Very good | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| USE OF ENGLISH: Personal LOG and MOVIE (individual mark) | LOG: - half or more of the answers are incorrect - written English is incomprehensible - no attemtp is made to structure the document MOVIE: - spoken English is incomprehensible or not enough is said - text is mostly read from paper | LOG: - several answers are not correct - some answers are missing or in the wrong place - written English contains errors but is still comprehensible MOVIE: - spoken English is poor or very little is said by the character - student relies on text sheet often | LOG: - only one or two answers are slightly wrong - log contains all items and is clearly legible - written English is adequate MOVIE: - spoken English is adequate - mistakes do not detract from overall impression - student rarely peeks at sheet | LOG: - all answers are correct - log looks neat and well organized - written English is perfect MOVIE: -spoken English approaches near-native quality - student improvises or knows lines by heart | 25% |
| GROUP LOG: organization and use of English (group mark) | - no attempts to structure content - written English is mostly incomprehensible | - some structure in content is present, but the overall impression is still somewhat confusing - written English contains errors and sometimes confuses the reader | - overall structure is clearly visible - written English is adequate and mistakes do not detract from overall impression | - transparent structure, easily accessible - written English approaches near-native quality | 25% |
| COLLABORATION: active participant during preparation, and during performance (individual mark) | - members can't agree on common decisions; some members play no active role in the process - players are not tuned in to the contributions of other players | - members are able to work together but regularly have trouble agreeing on a common decision - players are only sometimes tuned into each other | - members work together with most members contributing fairly - players are well tuned into each other most of the time | - members work together well and know how to build on individual qualities - performance runs smoothly; scenes follow one after the other seamlessly | 25% |
| CREATIVITY: theme, plot and play, and EASE OF HANDLING OF MULTI MEDIA (group mark) | - theme and plot are absent - scenes are confusing - no discernible link to A Kestrel For a Knave - fail to turn in a recording | - theme and plot are not always clear - some scenes are confusing - only minor link to A Kestrel For a Knave - technical difficulties obsucre the message of the movie | - theme, plot and play are well thought out - link to A Kestrel For a Knave is present - only minor technical difficulties | - theme, plot and movie are highly original and funny - movie is clearly inspired by A Kestrel For a Knave - smooth technical delivery | 25% |
Total Score: |
|||||
The Public URL for this WebQuest:
http://zunal.com/webquest.php?w=92178
WebQuest Hits: 2,614
Save WebQuest as PDF
