The Science and Ethics of Human Cloning

#	Beginning 1	Developing 2	Very Good 3	Exemplary 4	Score
Information	Information had several inaccuracies OR was usually not clear.	Most information presented in the debate was clear and accurate, but was not usually thorough.	Most information presented in the debate was clear, accurate and thorough.	All information presented in the debate was clear, accurate and thorough.	%25
Use of Facts/Statistics	Every point was not supported.	Every major point was supported with facts, statistics and/or examples, but the relevance of some was questionable.	Every major point was adequately supported with relevant facts, statistics and/or examples.	Every major point was well supported with several relevant facts, statistics and/or examples.	%25
Organization	Arguments were not clearly tied to an idea (premise).	All arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) but the organization was sometimes not clear or logical.	Most arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) and organized in a tight, logical fashion.	All arguments were clearly tied to an idea (premise) and organized in a tight, logical fashion.	%25
Understanding of Topic	The team did not show an adequate understanding of the topic.	The team seemed to understand the main points of the topic and presented those with ease.	The team clearly undestood the topic in-depth and presented their information with ease.	The team clearly understood the topic in-depth and presented their information forcefully and convincingly.	%25
Total Score: %100