WebQuest
Ancient Greece Tour
Evaluation
Now it's time to get the results and evaluate the work done!
Let's see if you went through the challenge successfully.
Rubric
| # | Beginning | Developing | Accomplished | Exemplary | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project content | The information is not structured. The project lacks logics and clarity to perceive the main idea of the project. There are no interesting facts, it's hard to imagine the way that attraction looks like by the text given on the project. | The information is partly structured. The project lacks clarity to perceive the main idea of the project. There are no interesting facts about the attraction. | The information is partly structured. There are some interesting facts about the attraction. It's not very difficult to get the main idea of the project and imagine the way that attraction looks like by the text given on the project. | The information is fully structured. There are lots of interesting facts about the attraction. The text is made in a short, entertaining way. It's not difficult to get the main idea of the project and imagine the way that attraction looks like by the text given on the project. | 5 |
| Presentation | Presentation simply read aloud, not easily to follow, poorly illustrated, questions not handled.Not every student of the group took part in the presentation of the project (responsibilities for the presentation are not distributed among the students). | Presentation organised into stages, clearly illustrated and sufficiently detailed to give a general idea, some reading aloud but some improvised "telling", questions adequately handled. Not every student of the group took part in the presentation of the project. | Well organised presentation, with clear rationale, showing evidence of thorough research attractively illustrated some reading aloud but some improvised "telling", questions handled well. Two students out of three took part in the presentation of the project. | Presentation presented in an engaging, even entertaining way, technically impressive, well resourced even distribution of work, each contribution harmoniously linked to make a coherent whole report delivered with notes but not read aloud, questions handled effectively and spontaneously. Every student of the group took part in the presentation of the project. | 5 |
| Speaking and pronunciation | Does not speak clearly. Makes lots of phonetic mistakes. Lacks volume and/or rate, many verbal or physical distraction. Does not meet time requirement. | Speaks almost clearly but lacks consistent volume and rate. Still makes some minor phonetic mistakes but then corrects them. Some verbal/physical distractions. Does not meet time requirement. | Speaks clearly at an appropriate rate and volume. Almost doesn't make phonetic mistakes. Minimal verbal/physical distractions. Meets time requirement. | Speaks clearly at an appropriate rate and volume. There are no phonetic mistakes. No physical or verbal distractions. Meets time requirement. | 5 |
| Vocabulary, Grammar, Format and Spelling | Poor vocabulary choice.Major mechanical errors in grammar, formatting and spelling. | Vocabulary chosen is not very diverse. The final body of work has 3-5 mechanical errors in grammar, formatting and spelling. | Vocabulary choice is appropriate for the project. The final body of work has 1-2 mechanical errors in grammar, formatting and spelling. | The vocabulary is rich and diverse, it's appropriate for the project.The final body of work is free of mechanical errors. | 5 |
Total Score: 20 |
|||||
The Public URL for this WebQuest:
http://zunal.com/webquest.php?w=774135
WebQuest Hits: 436
Save WebQuest as PDF
