WebQuest
Whistleblowers: Ethics in Business
Evaluation
Group Essays will be marked with the rubric below, in addition each group member will recieve a seperate mark for their brainstorm/research sheet or notes.
Rubric
| # | Beginning | Developing | Very Good | Examplary | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence and Examples | Evidence or Examples are not explained or relevant. | At least one of the pieces of evidence and examples is relevant and has an explanation that shows how that piece of evidence supports the position. | Most of the evidence and examples are specific, relevant and explanations are given that show how each piece of evidence supports the position. | All of the evidence and examples are specific, relevant and explanations are given that show how each piece of evidence supports the position. | 10 |
| Required Content | More than half of required content was not included. | Most of the required content was covered; 1-2 items not discussed. | All required content covered. | Required Content was covered, with additional information. | 10 |
| Sources | No sources provided or work cited page. | Sources not properly cited or formatted. | Sources properley cited but 1-2 errors in citation format. | All sources properley cited; no errors in citation format. | 5 |
| Individual Research/Brainstorm Sheet | Very little evidence of research or brainstorming conducted. | Some evidence of research or brainstorming. | Evident that student has researched or brainstormed topic chosen. | Very evident that student has conducted lengthy research or brainstorming and provides additional information to topic researched. | 10 |
Total Score: |
|||||
The Public URL for this WebQuest:
http://zunal.com/webquest.php?w=72230
WebQuest Hits: 12,545
Save WebQuest as PDF
