WebQuest
The Scarlet Letter: How do we know what is right and what is wrong?
Evaluation
Checklist:
Initial posting (position, situation, explanation)
Counter argument 1 (counters response dissimilar from yours)
Counter argument 2 (counters response from peer whose position agrees with your initial posting)
Additional comments:
To earn credit for this assignment, you must go above and beyond the required postings. In all three postings, you should respond to peers a few times to create an online conversation and reach a greater, collective, and nuanced condition.
| 4 Advanced | 3 Proficient | 2 Developing | 1 Novice | |
| Initial Posting | Student thoroughly examines or generates two or more situations and creates a nuanced defense of why shame is or is not a fitting punishment. | Student thoroughly examines or generates one situation and defends why shame is or is not a proficient punishment. | Student examines or generates one situation and lacks a supported defense of whether or not public shame is a fitting punishment. | Student examines or generates one situation but lacks a defense. |
| Counter Argument: Steps 3 & 4 | Student addresses the original situation(s) and effectively counters the opposing viewpoint with multiple sources to support his/her argument. | Student addresses the original situation(s) and effectively counters the opposing viewpoint with one sources to support his/her argument. | Student addresses the original situation(s) and effectively counters the opposing viewpoint without an outside source to support his/her argument. | Student does not address the original situation(s) nor effectively counters the opposing viewpoint. Does not use an outside source to support argument. |
| Collaboration | Student respectfully interacts with peers and builds upon ideas with prolonged (at least three per thread) and nuanced conversations in comment threads. | Student respectfully interacts with peers. Student builds upon ideas with conversation at least twice with each comment thread. | Student respectfully interacts with peers. Addresses peers� ideas by responding at least once per thread beyond the requirements. | Student does not respectfully interact with peers. Student makes the required postings and comments but does not create a dialogue. |
| Research | Student engages with at least four sources, two of which were not supplied by the teacher. | Student engages with at least three sources, one of which was not supplied by the teacher. | Student engages with at least two sources, both of which were supplied by the teacher. | Student engages with only one source, which was supplied by the teacher. |
The Public URL for this WebQuest:
http://zunal.com/webquest.php?w=236290
WebQuest Hits: 690
Save WebQuest as PDF
