| |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
Score |
|
|
Persuasive Techniques Identified & Analyzed
|
Two examples or less of persuasive techniques were correctly identified and analyzed. No attempt at group analysis. |
Three examples of persuasive techniques were correctly identified and analyzed. Group analysis was attempted, but lacks depth. |
Four examples of persuasive techniques were correctly identified and analyzed. Group analysis is present and acceptable. |
Four examples of persuasive techniques were correctly identified and analyzed. Group analysis is thoughtful and perceptive. |
25% |
|
|
Poster/PowerPoint
|
The poster/PowerPoint lacks creativity, is not appealing to the eye, and organization is lacking. |
The poster/PowerPoint makes an attempt to be visually creative, appealing and organized, but falls a little short. |
The poster/PowerPoint is mostly visually creative, appealing and organized. |
The poster/PowerPoint is visually creative, appealing and organized. |
25% |
|
|
Oral Presentation of Poster/PowerPoint
|
The presentation was not practiced, not every group member presented, and voice and eye contact needed major improvement. |
The presentation was okay, some group members presented more than others, and voice projection and eye contact needed to be worked on more. |
The presentation was interesting, all group members contributed an equal amount, but the voice projection and eye contact need some improvement. |
The presentation was interesting, all group members contributed an equal amount, and voice projection and eye contact were strong. |
25% |
|
|
Conventions
|
There were many convention errors. Lacks proofreading. |
There were noticeable convention errors (more than three). |
There were one or two convention errors. |
There were no errors. |
25% |
|
| Total Score:
|
