WebQuest
Favorite String Instrument
Evaluation
Rubric
| # | Unsatisfactory 1 | Average 2 | Very Good 3 | Excellent 4 | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Composer | Content contains lots of factual errors, and not everything was covered. | Content was better, one or two important things were left out. Not as many factual errors. | Content was fairly accurate, and only one thing was incorrect or left out. | Content was well presented, no factual errors, and everything was covered. Great job! | %25 |
| The Artist | Pictures are not very accurate; parts of instrument were labeled incorrectly, needed more pictures on poster. | Pictures are more accurate and show more effort; only one or two parts of instrument were labeled incorrectly, still need a few more pictures on poster. | Pictures are fairly accurate, and only one picture was left out. | Pictures were very accurate and everything was covered! Great job! | %25 |
| The Talent Agent | Music selection was not appropriate, and not everything about the piece was covered. Very few (if any) musical terms were used to describe the piece. | Music selection was ok, although one or two important things were left out about the piece. A few musical terms were used. | Music selection was fine, and only one thing was incorrect or left out about the piece. Music was described using a good musical terms. | Musical selection was wonderful, and everything important was covered. Great description of piece with lots of musical terms! | %25 |
| The Historian | Content contains lots of factual errors, and not everything was covered. | Content was better, one or two important things were left out. Not as many factual errors. | Content was fairly accurate, and only one thing was incorrect or left out. | Content was well presented, no factual errors, and everything was covered. Great job! | %25 |
Total Score: %100 |
|||||
The Public URL for this WebQuest:
http://zunal.com/webquest.php?w=24951
WebQuest Hits: 3,526
Save WebQuest as PDF
