WebQuest
Stand UP to Teen Violence
Evaluation
Evaluation
The group will be evaluated on their power point using a rubric. Each individual will be evaluated on their ebook summary as well as their persuasive writing piece. During the group conference as well as the individual conference the teacher will discuss each rubric.
Group Evaluations
Power point presentation, 40 points
Group Work evaluation, 24 points
Individual Evaluations
Ebook Summary, 12 points
Persuasive Writing, 6 points
Individual Work evaluation, 24 points
Total points 106
106-101 = A+
100-95 = A
94-90 = A-
89-87 = B+
86-83 = B
82-80 = B-
79-77 = C+
76-73 = C
72-70 = C-
69-67 = D+
66-63 = D
62-60 = D-
59 and below = F
Throughout the project group and individual conferences will be held as need.
Rubric
# | Developing | Refining | Strong | Exceptional | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Organization of Information | 1-Lead: Introduction does not give any information about the topic, opening is random. 1-Body: Sequence of information is out of logical order. Highlights random events. 1-Ending: Summary not present. Closure was quick and left the reader with questions. | 2-Lead: The introduction restates the topic. 2-Body: Use of transition words to sequence some information. Highlights Events. 2-Ending: Quick summary of information. closure was quick and to the point. | 3-Lead: Provides an introduction that is original. 3-Body: Sequence of information. Spotlights some important information. 3-Ending:Summary of information is thoughtful. Sense of closure with a few questions answered. | 4-Lead: Engages the readers with an introduction that is original and thought provoking. 4-Body: Logical sequence of information. Spotlights important information and events. 4-Ending: Summary of information is thoughtful and well planned. Strong sense of closure with questions answered. | 12 |
Analysis of Text Use of Text Evidence | 1- Analysis of Text: Identifies central idea. Identifies author's purpose. Identifies analogies. 1-Cite Text Evidence: Recites text as a means of citation and literal meaning drawn from text. | 2- Analysis of Text: Determines central idea and provides basic analysis of the specific section of text. Basic analysis of author's purpose. Basic analysis of word choice and identifies analogies. 2-Cite Text Evidence: Synthesizes texts and literal meaning drawn from text. | 3- Analysis of Text: Determines central idea and provides basic analysis over the course of the text. Basic analysis of author's purpose and synthesizes each viewpoint. Analysis of word choice and the impact of analogies. 3-Cite Text Evidence: Supports analysis of text and some inferences drawn from text. | 4-Analysis of Text: Determines central idea analyzes the development over the course of the text. Analyzes author's purpose and responds to conflicting viewpoints. Analyzes meaning of words and the impact of word choice and analogies. 4-Cite Text Evidence: Supports analysis of texts and inferences drawn from text. | 8 |
Use of Digital Resources | 1-Use of technology: Identifies the advantages and disadvantages of using a single type of medium. 1-Type of technology: Integrates 1 medium such as (videos, photos, multimedia, digital or print) to present a topic. | 2-Use of technology: Synthesizes the advantages and disadvantages of using a single type of medium. 2-Type of technology:Integrates 1-2 medium such as (videos, photos, multimedia, digital or print) to present a topic. | 3-Use of technology: Evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of using a single type of medium. 3-Type of technology: Integrates a few mediums such as (videos, photos, multimedia, digital or print) to present a topic. | 4-Use of technology: Evaluates the advantages and disadvantages using many types of mediums to present a topic. 4-Type of technology: Integrates multiple sources of mediums such as (videos, photos, multimedia, digital or print) to present a topic. | 8 |
Conventions | 1-Spelling/ Capitalization: Use of spelling and capitalization is inconsistent throughout the entire writing and editing is not present. 1- Punctuation: Neglects the use of punctuation which interferes with meaning. 1-Grammar: Incorrect use of grammar which interferes with meaning. | 2-Spelling/ Capitalization: Spelling is somewhat correct but inconsistent. Capitalization is somewhat correct but demonstrates some inconsistencies. 2- Punctuation: Punctuation is inconsistent. 2-Grammar: Mostly applies the rules of grammar, some inconsistencies. | 3-Spelling/ Capitalization: Spelling is mostly correct and demonstrates understanding of capitalization. 3- Punctuation: Uses proper punctuation. 3-Grammar: Applies the rules of grammar. | 4-Spelling/ Capitalization: All spelling is correct and demonstrates understanding of how to capitalize dialogue, abbreviations, proper nouns, and titles is evident. 4- Punctuation: Use of punctuation enhances meaning. 4-Grammar:Understands and applies the rules of grammar. The writer effectively breaks the rules for stylistic reasons. | 12 |
Total Score: |
Attachments
File
-
Persuasive Writing Scoring Guide
Description: Written By Ruth Culham
File
-
Grading Chart persuasive writing
Description: Written by Ruth Culham
File
-
Group Work Rubric
Description: Resources Updated 11/5/03 web.alfredstate.edu/assessment/GenEd/
File
-
Individual Work Rubric
Description: Resource www1.kent.k12.wa.us/curriculum/.../Individual_Project_Rubric.doc
File
-
Summary Rubric
Description: Copyright Prentice-Hall
The Public URL for this WebQuest:
http://zunal.com/webquest.php?w=164984
WebQuest Hits: 7,834
Save WebQuest as PDF