Welcome Guest    
    Home | Browse | Help | Questions? Login | Register    
 
     
     
 
     
 
The United States Presidential Election
 
     
     
 

Welcome
Introduction
Task
Process
Evaluation
Conclusion
Teacher Page

 
     
     
 

About Author(s)
Evaluate WebQuest
Reviews
Statistics
Export WebQuest
Share This WebQuest

 
     
     
 
Evaluation Evaluation
 
     
     
 


            

 Students will be using the internet to research Presidential candidates, the Presidential electoral process, and the Presidential qualifications in the United States.  Students will be expected to select a specific process to be evaluated on, each with a specific set of criteria required.  The evaluated criteria may include; word count, slide count, multimedia usage, writing mechanics, presentation, research and citation usage.

Once you have viewed the rubric and completed your task, proceed to the Conclusion section and answer the questions.  This will be counted as a grade towards you final project.

  

    

 

Criteria

Achievement Level

1: Unsatisfactory

2: Less than Satisfactory

3: Satisfactory

4: Good

5: Excellent

Researching Presidential Candidates and the Electoral Process.

(Criterion to be met will include word counts, slide counts, and or multi-media usage, as required by process)

0 points
No research is evident in the assignment.  The criterion was not met on chosen process.

40 points
Minimal research is demonstrated with less than 2 resources used in the assignment.  The criterion for the chosen process in the assignment was loosely met.

50 points
Adequate research is demonstrated.
with at least 3 resources used in the assignment.  The criterion for the chosen process has been adequately met.

60 points
Comprehensive research is demonstrated There are more than 3 resources The criteria for the chosen process in the assignment was met with a good amount of thought and details.

65 points
Exhaustive research is evident with more than 4 resources used in the assignment. The criterion for the chosen process in the assignment was met with an abundance of thought and detail.

Mechanics of Writing

(Includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are employed.

3 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice and/or word choice are present.

5 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Audience-appropriate language is employed.

7 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech.

10 points
The writer is clearly in command of standard, written academic English.


Research and Citations

(In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and references page listing and formatting)

0 points
No references page and no citations are included.

10 points
References page is present, but citations are inconsistently used.

15 points
References page is included. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.

20 points
References page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct.

25 points
In-text citations and a references page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of errors.

 

 
     
     
 
The Public URL for this WebQuest:
http://zunal.com/webquest.php?w=148668
 
     
 
     
Privacy Policy | Contact Us | About Us |
Copyright © 2001-2013 zunal.com All rights reserved.