| |
|
|
|
|
Score |
|
|
Bid to Buyers
15%
|
1) Letter is clear,to the point,and typed. Convinced buyer bridge is best.
2) Bridges estimated strength and span is presented.
3) Estimated cost is presented.
4) Diagrams drawn to scale and separate pages |
1) Letter is clear,and typed. Somewhat convinced buyer bridge is best.
2) Bridges estimated strength and span is presented.
3) Estimated cost is presented.
4)Diagram drawn to scale on one page |
1) Letter is typed. Weakly convinced buyer bridge is best.
2) Bridges estimated strength and span is presented.
3) Estimated cost is presented.
4)Diagram drawn and on one page |
1) Letter is present.
2) One of the following in letter,Bridges estimated strength and span is presented. Or estimated cost is presented.
3) Diagrams drawn but missing views |
15 |
|
|
Group Design
25%
|
1) Design diagrams drawn to scale, and detailed components displayed in separate diagrams.2) Materials chosen and reasons behind choices clearly stated |
1) Design diagrams drawn to scale, and detailed components displayed in separate diagrams.2) Materials chosen and reasons behind choices clearly stated. |
1) Design diagrams drawn, and detailed components displayed.2) Materials chosen and reasons behind choices stated |
1) Design diagrams drawn.2) Materials chosen stated |
25 |
|
|
Construction/working prototype
30%
|
1) Construction time used efficiently.2) Adjustments to design are noted.3) Working prototype in class for testing.4) Meets or exceeds all requirements |
1) Construction time used somewhat efficiently.2) Adjustments to design are noted.3) Working prototype in class for testing.4) Meets all requirements but one |
1) Construction time used somewhat ineffectively.2) Some adjustments to design are noted.3) Working prototype in class for testing.4) Meets one requirement |
1) Construction time used inefficiently.2) Rough working prototype in class for testing.3) No requirements met |
30 |
|
|
Wrap-up
30%
|
1) Typed paragraph with bridge building process clearly stated. All changes that occurred and reasons why.2) Stress on bridge calculated with work shown.3) At least 4 key parts of the bridge have force analysis described.4) Comparison between estimated cost, span, strength and actual cost, span, strength.5) Peer review evaluates all members |
1) Typed paragraph with bridge building process stated. All changes that occurred and reasons why.2)Stress calculated 3) At least 2-3 key parts of the bridge have force analysis described.4) Comparison between estimated cost, span, strength and actual cost, span, strength.5) Peer review evaluates all members but self |
1) Paragraph with bridge building process stated. Some changes that occurred and reasons why.2) Some mention of stress3) At least 1-2 key parts of the bridge have force analysis described.4) Little comparison between estimated cost, span, strength and actual cost, span, strength.5) Peer review evaluates some members |
1) Paragraph with bridge building process. Plan changes that occurred barely described.2) Stress not done.3) 0-1 key parts of the bridge have force analysis.4) Minimal or no Comparison between estimated cost, span, strength and actual cost, span, strength.5) Peer review missing |
30 |
|
| Total Score:
|
