Below is an evaluation table. The evaluation is a point scale determining varying degrees of participation of the web quest.
|#||Examplary, 4 points||Very good, 3 points||Developing, 2 points||Begining, 1 points||Score|
|TASKS/ WORKING INDIVIDUALLY||The content was well detailed and the questions were answered correctly. Task carried out showing great initiative.||fairly detailed content. Questions answered well.||Satisfactory answer and detail.||Evidence of reserearch, more detail needed.||TBA|
|TEAM WORK||Shared,Proof read and edited articles given and showed great sence of team work. excellent newspaper stucture of newspaper.||Proof read, edited articles. more communication needed. satisfactory team work.||more team participation needed.||Minimal evidence of team participation||TBA|
|USE OF RESOURCES||Accessed resources provided.Some extra resources were also researched. great referencing.||Accessed resources given, need to be more vigilant on the referencing||satisfactory use of reources,referencing needs to be formalised.||Minimal evidence of use of resources, no references||TBA|
|STRUCTURE, GRAMMAR AND SPELLING||Excellent||Very good||Developing||Begining||TBA|